Intel Core i5-13400F vs Intel Core Ultra 9 285K (Balanced)
vs
Faster
Intel
Overall performance index
85,1
Rank 8 of 27 CPUs tested
MSRP US$589
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K (Balanced) is 33,0% faster on average
Intel Core i5-13400F
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K (Balanced)
Individual tests: Intel Core i5-13400F wins 1, Intel Core Ultra 9 285K (Balanced) wins 26 (27 shared tests)
Performance by discipline
Gaming (720p)
+19,3 %
253,9fps
314,7fps
Multi-thread
+48,3 %
71,9points
139,1points
Single-thread
+28,0 %
111,9points
155,5points
Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-13400F
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K (Balanced)
Other tested CPUs
Click a row to open the chart with every CPU tested; hover shows the gap in %.
Gaming (720p) – all CPUs tested
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K (Balanced) +23,9 %Individual results (10 tests)
VR Mark Orange Room 15.344 points 20.230 points +31,8 %
VR Mark Blue Room 6.492 points 6.473 points +0,3 %
Unigine Superposition 1.1 720p Low Punkte 35.636 points 37.928 points +6,4 %
Unigine Superposition720p, Low,FPS 266,5 fps 283,7 fps +6,4 %
Shadow of the Tomb RaiderLite, 720p 231,0 fps 296,0 fps +28,1 %
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark720p, Low 23.380 points 23.655 points +1,2 %
Resident Evil VILLAGE720p, Lite, DX12 278,5 fps 280,8 fps +0,8 %
Metro Exodus Enhanced Edition720p, Low, Moscow 239,7 fps 398,4 fps +66,2 %
Fortnite720p, Low 306,8 fps –
Counter-Strike 2 335,3 fps 412,2 fps +22,9 %
Multi-thread – all CPUs tested
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K (Balanced) +93,3 %Individual results (16 tests)
7-ZipMIPS) 32 MB 80.402 MIPS 179.823 MIPS +123,7 %
Corona 1.3lower is better 95,0 s 40,0 s +137,5 %
HandBrake4GB Video-> HQ1080P30fpslower is better 1.191 s 610,0 s +95,2 %
WinRAR 6.0164-Bit-Version 24.846 KB/s 45.477 KB/s +83,0 %
Cinebench R15 Multi-Core 2.304 points 6.392 points +177,4 %
Cinebench R20 Multi-Core 5.866 points 16.592 points +182,9 %
3D Mark Time Spy ExtremeCPU 5.539 points 14.275 points +157,7 %
3D Mark Time SpyCPU 13.066 points 18.531 points +41,8 %
3DMark CPU BenchmarkMax Threads 7.371 points 18.953 points +157,1 %
3DMark CPU Benchmark16 Threads 7.378 points 14.881 points +101,7 %
3DMark CPU Benchmark8 Threads 5.683 points 9.669 points +70,1 %
3DMark CPU Benchmark4 Threads 3.499 points 5.050 points +44,3 %
3DMark CPU Benchmark2 Threads 1.905 points 2.730 points +43,3 %
Geekbench 5.5.1 CPUMulti-Thread 12.557 points 27.029 points +115,3 %
POV-Ray v3.7Multi-Thread 5.189 px/s 15.184 px/s +192,6 %
Cinebench R23 n-CoreMulti-Thread – 42.618 points
Single-thread – all CPUs tested
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K (Balanced) +38,9 %Individual results (4 tests)
3DMark CPU Benchmark1 Thread 969,0 points 1.389 points +43,3 %
Geekbench 5.5.1 CPUSingle-Thread 1.745 points 2.337 points +33,9 %
POV-Ray v3.7Single-Thread 644,0 px/s 938,0 px/s +45,7 %
Cinebench R23 1-CoreSingle-Thread – 2.417 points
Price / performance
Each dot is a CPU we tested – the further top-left, the more performance per euro.
Specifications
Key details
| Intel Core i5-13400F | Intel Core Ultra 9 285K (Balanced) | |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | Raptor Lake | Arrow Lake |
| Series | Core 13000 | Core Ultra 200 |
| Release | Q1 2023 | Q4 2024 |
| Launch MSRP | US$196 | US$589 |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | Yes |
Cores, clocks and cache
| Intel Core i5-13400F | Intel Core Ultra 9 285K (Balanced) | |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / threads | 10 | 24 |
| Threads | 16 | 24 |
| Performance cores | 6 | 8 |
| Efficient cores | 4 | 16 |
| Base clock | 2.5 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| Max boost clock | 4.6 GHz | 5.7 GHz |
| L2 cache | 9.5 MB | 40 MB |
| L3 cache | 20 MB | 36 MB |
Power and manufacturing
| Intel Core i5-13400F | Intel Core Ultra 9 285K (Balanced) | |
|---|---|---|
| TDP / base power | 65 W | 125 W |
| Max turbo power | 148 W | 250 W |
| Process | Intel 7 | n/a |
| Max temperature (Tjmax) | 100 °C | 105 °C |
Platform and connectivity
| Intel Core i5-13400F | Intel Core Ultra 9 285K (Balanced) | |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA1851 |
| Memory | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s, Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | Up to DDR5 6400 MT/s |
| Memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| PCI Express | PCIe 5.0 and 4.0 | PCIe 5.0 and 4.0 |
| PCIe lanes | 20 | 24 |
| Integrated graphics | None (graphics card required) | Intel Graphics |
Our measurements
| Intel Core i5-13400F | Intel Core Ultra 9 285K (Balanced) | |
|---|---|---|
| System power idle | 93 W | 78 W |
| System power load | 226 W | 309 W |
| CPU package idle | 11.8 W | 11.7 W |
| CPU package load | 115 W | 189 W |
| Temperature idle | 28 °C | 34 °C |
| Temperature load | 61 °C | 74 °C |
| Highest measured clock | 4588 MHz / 3292 MHz (E) | 5400 MHz (P) / 4600 MHz (E) |
| Avg clock in games | 4090 MHz (P) / 3291 MHz (E) | n/a |
Test system
| Intel Core i5-13400F | Intel Core Ultra 9 285K (Balanced) | |
|---|---|---|
| Test configuration | n/a | Balanced |
| Motherboard | ASUS ROG Strix Z790-E Gaming Wifi | ASUS ROG Strix Z890-F Gaming Wifi |
| Memory | n/a | Lexar ARES RGB Black DIMM Kit 32GB, DDR5-6400 |
| CPU cooler | DeepCool LT720 | DeepCool LS720 |
| Operating system | Windows 11 21H2 | Windows 11 23H2 |
| Settings | DDR5-6400 | DDR5-6400, Ultimate Leistung, Intel Presets, 10.1.19867.8574 chipset · Ausbalanciert, wegen vergleich |
Buy
Intel Core i5-13400F
No offer in our shop network right now.
MSRP: US$196
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
No offer in our shop network right now.
MSRP: US$589
More comparisons
Intel Core i5-13400F vs Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
Intel Core i5-13400F vs Intel Core i9-13900K
Intel Core i5-13400F vs Intel Core i5-13600K
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K (Balanced) vs Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K (Balanced) vs Intel Core i9-13900K
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K (Balanced) vs Intel Core i5-13600K
