← Back to the benchmark ranking
KFA2 GeForce RTX 5070 Ti HOF vs MSI GeForce RTX 5070 Inspire 3X
vs
KFA2 GeForce RTX 5070 Ti HOF is 25,0% faster on average
KFA2 GeForce RTX 5070 Ti HOF
MSI GeForce RTX 5070 Inspire 3X
Individual tests: KFA2 GeForce RTX 5070 Ti HOF wins 39, MSI GeForce RTX 5070 Inspire 3X wins 2 (41 shared tests)
Performance by resolution
Full HD (1080p)
+10,1 %
98,0fps
89,0fps
4K without ray tracing
+26,5 %
86,0fps
68,0fps
4K with ray tracing
+31,0 %
76,0fps
58,0fps
8K
+34,0 %
67,0fps
50,0fps
Game benchmarks
KFA2 GeForce RTX 5070 Ti HOF
MSI GeForce RTX 5070 Inspire 3X
Other tested cards
Click a row to open the chart with all tested cards; hover shows the gap in %.
Avg. Full HD (1080p) – all tested cards
KFA2 GeForce RTX 5070 Ti HOF +10,1 %Individual results (22 tests)
3D Mark Fire Strike Extreme Graphic Score 35.383 Punkte 28.688 Punkte +23,3 %
3D Mark Fire Strike Ultra Graphic Score 18.240 Punkte 14.284 Punkte +27,7 %
3D Mark Port Royal v1.32560x1440 19.313 Punkte 14.190 Punkte +36,1 %
3D Mark Port Royal v1.32560x1440 89,4 fps 65,7 fps +36,1 %
3D Mark SpeedWay2560x1440,DX12 Ultimate,fps 77,3 fps 58,7 fps +31,8 %
3D Mark SpeedWay2560x1440,DX12 Ultimate,Score 7.733 Punkte 5.868 Punkte +31,8 %
3D Mark Time Spy Extreme Graphic Score 13.540 Punkte 10.775 Punkte +25,7 %
Black Myth Wukong Benchmark1920x1080, Cinematic,100%, DLSS/FSR, No FrameGeneration,No Raytracing 71,0 fps 61,0 fps +16,4 %
Black Myth Wukong Benchmark1920x1080, Cinematic,100%, DLSS/FSR, No FrameGeneration,Raytracing-Very-High 48,0 fps 39,0 fps +23,1 %
Final Fantasy XV BenchmarkHighest,kein DLSS, 1080p 16.925 Punkte 13.733 Punkte +23,2 %
Fortnite1920x1080 155,6 fps 156,6 fps +0,6 %
Fortnite 1920x1080 P99 219,4 fps 224,9 fps +2,5 %
Fortnite P0.1 65,6 fps 21,6 fps +203,7 %
Geekbench 6.4.0 OpenCL 248.508 Punkte 188.470 Punkte +31,9 %
Geekbench 6.4.0 VULKAN 233.419 Punkte 188.128 Punkte +24,1 %
Metro Exodus P0.1 48,6 fps 39,0 fps +24,6 %
Monster Hunter Wilds Benchmark1920x1080, Ultra+NoDLSS,No-Raytracing 105,5 fps 91,7 fps +15,1 %
Synthetische Benchmarks 823,0 Rating 643,0 Rating +28,0 %
Unigine Superposition1080p Extreme 118,5 fps 99,3 fps +19,3 %
Unigine Superposition 1080p Extreme min FPS 94,2 fps 76,9 fps +22,5 %
Unigine Superposition 1080p Extreme max FPS 154,5 fps 130,7 fps +18,2 %
Unigine Superposition 1080p Extreme Punkte 15.840 fps 13.276 fps +19,3 %
Avg. 4K without ray tracing – all tested cards
KFA2 GeForce RTX 5070 Ti HOF +26,5 %Individual results (9 tests)
Black Myth Wukong Benchmark3840x2160, Cinematic,50%, DLSS/FSR, No FrameGeneration,No Raytracing 67,0 fps 56,0 fps +19,6 %
Cyberpunk 2077Ultra Preset, 3840x2160 60,2 fps 48,6 fps +24,0 %
Cyberpunk 2077 2.21 Ultra 3840x2160 min 48,7 fps 41,1 fps +18,6 %
Cyberpunk 2077 Ultra 3840x2160 max 77,4 fps 59,9 fps +29,1 %
Final Fantasy XV BenchmarkHighest,kein DLSS,3840x2160 8.150 Punkte 6.411 Punkte +27,1 %
Metro Exodus Ehanced Edition3840x2160 / Extreme 105,5 fps 77,0 fps +37,0 %
Monster Hunter Wilds Benchmark3840x2160, Ultra+NoDLSS,No-Raytracing 57,0 fps 45,4 fps +25,5 %
Shadow of the Tomb RaiderUltra, 3840x2160 131,0 fps 100,0 fps +31,0 %
Shadow of the Tomb RaiderUltra, 3840x2160 20.522 fps 15.741 fps +30,4 %
Avg. 4K with ray tracing – all tested cards
KFA2 GeForce RTX 5070 Ti HOF +31,0 %Individual results (8 tests)
Black Myth Wukong Benchmark3840x2160, Cinematic,50%, DLSS/FSR, No FrameGeneration,Raytracing-Very-High 46,0 fps 37,0 fps +24,3 %
Cyberpunk 2077Low RayTracing Low OHNE DLSS-FSR, 3840x2160 54,1 fps 44,1 fps +22,8 %
Cyberpunk 2077RayTracing Low DLSS / FSR2.1 3840x2160 99,6 fps 74,3 fps +34,0 %
Cyberpunk 2077 2.21 RayTracing DLSS 3840x2160 min 89,7 fps 74,3 fps +20,7 %
Cyberpunk 2077 2.21 RayTracing Low 3840x2160 min 44,5 fps 37,6 fps +18,2 %
Cyberpunk 2077 Low RayTracing Low 3840x2160 max 67,4 fps 53,7 fps +25,5 %
Cyberpunk 2077 RayTracing DLSS 3840x2160 max 118,6 fps 97,0 fps +22,3 %
Metro Exodus P99. Moscow3840x2160 DXR,Ultra,no DLSS 187,9 fps 138,1 fps +36,1 %
Avg. 8K – all tested cards
KFA2 GeForce RTX 5070 Ti HOF +34,0 %Individual results (2 tests)
Unigine Superposition8k Extreme 67,4 fps 50,3 fps +33,8 %
Unigine Superposition 8k Optimized 9.004 fps 6.729 fps +33,8 %
Price / performance
Each dot is a tested card – the further up and left, the more performance per euro.
Specifications
Key details
| KFA2 GeForce RTX 5070 Ti HOF | MSI GeForce RTX 5070 Inspire 3X | |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Blackwell | Blackwell |
| Generation | Blackwell | Blackwell |
| Type | Desktop GPU | Desktop GPU |
Detailed specifications
| KFA2 GeForce RTX 5070 Ti HOF | MSI GeForce RTX 5070 Inspire 3X | |
|---|---|---|
| Shader processors (CUDA / stream) | 8,960 | 6,144 |
| Base clock | 2,300 MHz | 2,330 MHz |
| Boost clock | 2,450 MHz | 2,510 MHz |
| Power draw (TDP/TGP) | 300 W | 250 W |
VRAM capacity and type
| KFA2 GeForce RTX 5070 Ti HOF | MSI GeForce RTX 5070 Inspire 3X | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |
| Memory size | 16 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 192 Bit |
Form factor and compatibility
| KFA2 GeForce RTX 5070 Ti HOF | MSI GeForce RTX 5070 Inspire 3X | |
|---|---|---|
| Interface | PCIe Gen 5 | PCIe Gen 5 |
Buy
KFA2 GeForce RTX 5070 Ti HOF
No offer in our shop network right now.
MSI GeForce RTX 5070 Inspire 3X
No offer in our shop network right now.
More comparisons
KFA2 GeForce RTX 5070 Ti HOF vs KFA2 GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 1ClickOC
KFA2 GeForce RTX 5070 Ti HOF vs MSI GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Vanguard
KFA2 GeForce RTX 5070 Ti HOF vs KFA2 GeForce RTX 5070 1ClickOC
MSI GeForce RTX 5070 Inspire 3X vs KFA2 GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 1ClickOC
MSI GeForce RTX 5070 Inspire 3X vs MSI GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Vanguard
MSI GeForce RTX 5070 Inspire 3X vs KFA2 GeForce RTX 5070 1ClickOC
