Intel Core i5-13400F vs Intel Core i9-14900K (0x125 Patch)
vs
Faster
Intel
Overall performance index
85,9
Rank 4 of 27 CPUs tested
MSRP US$589
Intel Core i9-14900K (0x125 Patch) is 33,6% faster on average
Intel Core i5-13400F
Intel Core i9-14900K (0x125 Patch)
Individual tests: Intel Core i5-13400F wins 2, Intel Core i9-14900K (0x125 Patch) wins 26 (28 shared tests)
Performance by discipline
Gaming (720p)
+24,4 %
253,9fps
335,8fps
Multi-thread
+49,2 %
71,9points
141,7points
Single-thread
+23,8 %
111,9points
146,8points
Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-13400F
Intel Core i9-14900K (0x125 Patch)
Other tested CPUs
Click a row to open the chart with every CPU tested; hover shows the gap in %.
Gaming (720p) – all CPUs tested
Intel Core i9-14900K (0x125 Patch) +32,2 %Individual results (10 tests)
VR Mark Orange Room 15.344 points 20.822 points +35,7 %
VR Mark Blue Room 6.492 points 6.471 points +0,3 %
Unigine Superposition 1.1 720p Low Punkte 35.636 points 56.472 points +58,5 %
Unigine Superposition720p, Low,FPS 266,5 fps 422,4 fps +58,5 %
Shadow of the Tomb RaiderLite, 720p 231,0 fps 220,0 fps +5,0 %
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark720p, Low 23.380 points 23.596 points +0,9 %
Resident Evil VILLAGE720p, Lite, DX12 278,5 fps 426,6 fps +53,2 %
Metro Exodus Enhanced Edition720p, Low, Moscow 239,7 fps 274,3 fps +14,4 %
Fortnite720p, Low 306,8 fps 393,6 fps +28,3 %
Counter-Strike 2 335,3 fps 433,9 fps +29,4 %
Multi-thread – all CPUs tested
Intel Core i9-14900K (0x125 Patch) +96,9 %Individual results (15 tests)
7-ZipMIPS) 32 MB 80.402 MIPS 193.281 MIPS +140,4 %
Corona 1.3lower is better 95,0 s 38,0 s +150,0 %
HandBrake4GB Video-> HQ1080P30fpslower is better 1.191 s 754,0 s +58,0 %
WinRAR 6.0164-Bit-Version 24.846 KB/s 51.150 KB/s +105,9 %
Cinebench R15 Multi-Core 2.304 points 5.651 points +145,3 %
Cinebench R20 Multi-Core 5.866 points 13.919 points +137,3 %
3D Mark Time Spy ExtremeCPU 5.539 points 11.819 points +113,4 %
3D Mark Time SpyCPU 13.066 points 19.989 points +53,0 %
3DMark CPU BenchmarkMax Threads 7.371 points 15.683 points +112,8 %
3DMark CPU Benchmark16 Threads 7.378 points 11.585 points +57,0 %
3DMark CPU Benchmark8 Threads 5.683 points 8.906 points +56,7 %
3DMark CPU Benchmark4 Threads 3.499 points 4.861 points +38,9 %
3DMark CPU Benchmark2 Threads 1.905 points 2.486 points +30,5 %
Geekbench 5.5.1 CPUMulti-Thread 12.557 points 24.684 points +96,6 %
POV-Ray v3.7Multi-Thread 5.189 px/s 12.348 px/s +138,0 %
Single-thread – all CPUs tested
Intel Core i9-14900K (0x125 Patch) +31,2 %Individual results (3 tests)
3DMark CPU Benchmark1 Thread 969,0 points 1.276 points +31,7 %
Geekbench 5.5.1 CPUSingle-Thread 1.745 points 2.278 points +30,5 %
POV-Ray v3.7Single-Thread 644,0 px/s 851,0 px/s +32,1 %
Price / performance
Each dot is a CPU we tested – the further top-left, the more performance per euro.
Specifications
Key details
| Intel Core i5-13400F | Intel Core i9-14900K (0x125 Patch) | |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | Raptor Lake | Raptor Lake |
| Series | Core 13000 | Core 14000 |
| Release | Q1 2023 | Q4 2023 |
| Launch MSRP | US$196 | US$589 |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | Yes |
Cores, clocks and cache
| Intel Core i5-13400F | Intel Core i9-14900K (0x125 Patch) | |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / threads | 10 | 24 |
| Threads | 16 | 32 |
| Performance cores | 6 | 8 |
| Efficient cores | 4 | 16 |
| Base clock | 2.5 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| Max boost clock | 4.6 GHz | 6 GHz |
| L2 cache | 9.5 MB | 32 MB |
| L3 cache | 20 MB | 36 MB |
Power and manufacturing
| Intel Core i5-13400F | Intel Core i9-14900K (0x125 Patch) | |
|---|---|---|
| TDP / base power | 65 W | 125 W |
| Max turbo power | 148 W | 253 W |
| Process | Intel 7 | Intel 7 |
| Max temperature (Tjmax) | 100 °C | 100 °C |
Platform and connectivity
| Intel Core i5-13400F | Intel Core i9-14900K (0x125 Patch) | |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA1700 |
| Memory | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s, Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | Up to DDR5 5600 MT/s, Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s |
| Memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| PCI Express | PCIe 5.0 and 4.0 | PCIe 5.0 and 4.0 |
| PCIe lanes | 20 | 20 |
| Integrated graphics | None (graphics card required) | Intel UHD Graphics 770 |
Our measurements
| Intel Core i5-13400F | Intel Core i9-14900K (0x125 Patch) | |
|---|---|---|
| System power idle | 93 W | 104 W |
| System power load | 226 W | 422.2 W |
| CPU package idle | 11.8 W | 87.7 W |
| CPU package load | 115 W | 253 W |
| Temperature idle | 28 °C | 39 °C |
| Temperature load | 61 °C | 82 °C |
| Highest measured clock | 4588 MHz / 3292 MHz (E) | 5700 MHz (P) / 4400 MHz (E) |
| Avg clock in games | 4090 MHz (P) / 3291 MHz (E) | 5600 MHz (P) / 4400 MHz (E) |
Test system
| Intel Core i5-13400F | Intel Core i9-14900K (0x125 Patch) | |
|---|---|---|
| Test configuration | n/a | 0x125 Patch |
| Motherboard | ASUS ROG Strix Z790-E Gaming Wifi | ASUS ROG Strix Z790-E Gaming Wifi |
| Memory | n/a | Lexar ARES RGB Black DIMM Kit 32GB, DDR5-6400 |
| CPU cooler | DeepCool LT720 | DeepCool LT720 |
| Operating system | Windows 11 21H2 | Windows 11 21H2 |
| Settings | DDR5-6400 | DDR5-6400, Ultimate Leistung, Intel Presets, NO Limit Breaker · Ausbalanciert, wegen vergleich |
Buy
Intel Core i5-13400F
No offer in our shop network right now.
MSRP: US$196
Intel Core i9-14900K
No offer in our shop network right now.
MSRP: US$589
More comparisons
Intel Core i5-13400F vs Intel Core i9-14900K
Intel Core i5-13400F vs Intel Core i9-13900K
Intel Core i5-13400F vs Intel Core i5-13600K
Intel Core i5-13400F vs Intel Core i5-14600K
Intel Core i5-13400F vs Intel Core i5-14600K (0x125 Patch)
Intel Core i9-14900K (0x125 Patch) vs Intel Core i9-14900K
Intel Core i9-14900K (0x125 Patch) vs Intel Core i9-13900K
Intel Core i9-14900K (0x125 Patch) vs Intel Core i5-13600K
Intel Core i9-14900K (0x125 Patch) vs Intel Core i5-14600K
