← Back to the benchmark ranking
KFA2 GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 1ClickOC vs MSI GeForce RTX 5070 Inspire 3X
vs
Faster
NVIDIA
Overall performance index
55,7
Rank 8 of 30 tested cards
KFA2 GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 1ClickOC is 23,4% faster on average
KFA2 GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 1ClickOC
MSI GeForce RTX 5070 Inspire 3X
Individual tests: KFA2 GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 1ClickOC wins 40, MSI GeForce RTX 5070 Inspire 3X wins 1 (41 shared tests)
Performance by resolution
Full HD (1080p)
+10,1 %
98,0fps
89,0fps
4K without ray tracing
+25,0 %
85,0fps
68,0fps
4K with ray tracing
+27,6 %
74,0fps
58,0fps
8K
+32,0 %
66,0fps
50,0fps
Game benchmarks
KFA2 GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 1ClickOC
MSI GeForce RTX 5070 Inspire 3X
Other tested cards
Click a row to open the chart with all tested cards; hover shows the gap in %.
Avg. Full HD (1080p) – all tested cards
KFA2 GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 1ClickOC +10,1 %Individual results (22 tests)
3D Mark Fire Strike Extreme Graphic Score 34.664 Punkte 28.688 Punkte +20,8 %
3D Mark Fire Strike Ultra Graphic Score 17.688 Punkte 14.284 Punkte +23,8 %
3D Mark Port Royal v1.32560x1440 19.062 Punkte 14.190 Punkte +34,3 %
3D Mark Port Royal v1.32560x1440 88,3 fps 65,7 fps +34,3 %
3D Mark SpeedWay2560x1440,DX12 Ultimate,fps 75,8 fps 58,7 fps +29,1 %
3D Mark SpeedWay2560x1440,DX12 Ultimate,Score 7.576 Punkte 5.868 Punkte +29,1 %
3D Mark Time Spy Extreme Graphic Score 13.334 Punkte 10.775 Punkte +23,7 %
Black Myth Wukong Benchmark1920x1080, Cinematic,100%, DLSS/FSR, No FrameGeneration,No Raytracing 71,0 fps 61,0 fps +16,4 %
Black Myth Wukong Benchmark1920x1080, Cinematic,100%, DLSS/FSR, No FrameGeneration,Raytracing-Very-High 48,0 fps 39,0 fps +23,1 %
Final Fantasy XV BenchmarkHighest,kein DLSS, 1080p 11.693 Punkte 13.733 Punkte +17,4 %
Fortnite1920x1080 163,4 fps 156,6 fps +4,3 %
Fortnite 1920x1080 P99 253,6 fps 224,9 fps +12,8 %
Fortnite P0.1 37,4 fps 21,6 fps +73,1 %
Geekbench 6.4.0 OpenCL 237.342 Punkte 188.470 Punkte +25,9 %
Geekbench 6.4.0 VULKAN 220.826 Punkte 188.128 Punkte +17,4 %
Metro Exodus P0.1 47,7 fps 39,0 fps +22,3 %
Monster Hunter Wilds Benchmark1920x1080, Ultra+NoDLSS,No-Raytracing 103,5 fps 91,7 fps +12,9 %
Synthetische Benchmarks 786,0 Rating 643,0 Rating +22,2 %
Unigine Superposition1080p Extreme 111,4 fps 99,3 fps +12,2 %
Unigine Superposition 1080p Extreme min FPS 88,1 fps 76,9 fps +14,6 %
Unigine Superposition 1080p Extreme max FPS 133,8 fps 130,7 fps +2,4 %
Unigine Superposition 1080p Extreme Punkte 14.894 fps 13.276 fps +12,2 %
Avg. 4K without ray tracing – all tested cards
KFA2 GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 1ClickOC +25,0 %Individual results (9 tests)
Black Myth Wukong Benchmark3840x2160, Cinematic,50%, DLSS/FSR, No FrameGeneration,No Raytracing 66,0 fps 56,0 fps +17,9 %
Cyberpunk 2077Ultra Preset, 3840x2160 59,1 fps 48,6 fps +21,8 %
Cyberpunk 2077 2.21 Ultra 3840x2160 min 47,8 fps 41,1 fps +16,5 %
Cyberpunk 2077 Ultra 3840x2160 max 76,7 fps 59,9 fps +28,0 %
Final Fantasy XV BenchmarkHighest,kein DLSS,3840x2160 7.936 Punkte 6.411 Punkte +23,8 %
Metro Exodus Ehanced Edition3840x2160 / Extreme 100,9 fps 77,0 fps +31,0 %
Monster Hunter Wilds Benchmark3840x2160, Ultra+NoDLSS,No-Raytracing 56,1 fps 45,4 fps +23,7 %
Shadow of the Tomb RaiderUltra, 3840x2160 131,0 fps 100,0 fps +31,0 %
Shadow of the Tomb RaiderUltra, 3840x2160 20.489 fps 15.741 fps +30,2 %
Avg. 4K with ray tracing – all tested cards
KFA2 GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 1ClickOC +27,6 %Individual results (8 tests)
Black Myth Wukong Benchmark3840x2160, Cinematic,50%, DLSS/FSR, No FrameGeneration,Raytracing-Very-High 46,0 fps 37,0 fps +24,3 %
Cyberpunk 2077Low RayTracing Low OHNE DLSS-FSR, 3840x2160 53,0 fps 44,1 fps +20,4 %
Cyberpunk 2077RayTracing Low DLSS / FSR2.1 3840x2160 98,1 fps 74,3 fps +31,9 %
Cyberpunk 2077 2.21 RayTracing DLSS 3840x2160 min 88,3 fps 74,3 fps +18,7 %
Cyberpunk 2077 2.21 RayTracing Low 3840x2160 min 43,9 fps 37,6 fps +16,6 %
Cyberpunk 2077 Low RayTracing Low 3840x2160 max 66,6 fps 53,7 fps +24,0 %
Cyberpunk 2077 RayTracing DLSS 3840x2160 max 116,8 fps 97,0 fps +20,4 %
Metro Exodus P99. Moscow3840x2160 DXR,Ultra,no DLSS 181,2 fps 138,1 fps +31,2 %
Avg. 8K – all tested cards
KFA2 GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 1ClickOC +32,0 %Individual results (2 tests)
Unigine Superposition8k Extreme 66,1 fps 50,3 fps +31,3 %
Unigine Superposition 8k Optimized 8.833 fps 6.729 fps +31,3 %
Price / performance
Each dot is a tested card – the further up and left, the more performance per euro.
Specifications
Key details
| KFA2 GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 1ClickOC | MSI GeForce RTX 5070 Inspire 3X | |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Blackwell | Blackwell |
| Generation | Blackwell | Blackwell |
| Type | Desktop GPU | Desktop GPU |
Detailed specifications
| KFA2 GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 1ClickOC | MSI GeForce RTX 5070 Inspire 3X | |
|---|---|---|
| Shader processors (CUDA / stream) | 8,960 | 6,144 |
| Base clock | 2,300 MHz | 2,330 MHz |
| Boost clock | 2,450 MHz | 2,510 MHz |
| Power draw (TDP/TGP) | 300 W | 250 W |
VRAM capacity and type
| KFA2 GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 1ClickOC | MSI GeForce RTX 5070 Inspire 3X | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |
| Memory size | 16 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 192 Bit |
Form factor and compatibility
| KFA2 GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 1ClickOC | MSI GeForce RTX 5070 Inspire 3X | |
|---|---|---|
| Interface | PCIe Gen 5 | PCIe Gen 5 |
Buy
KFA2 GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 1ClickOC
No offer in our shop network right now.
MSI GeForce RTX 5070 Inspire 3X
No offer in our shop network right now.
More comparisons
KFA2 GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 1ClickOC vs KFA2 GeForce RTX 5070 Ti HOF
KFA2 GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 1ClickOC vs MSI GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Vanguard
KFA2 GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 1ClickOC vs KFA2 GeForce RTX 5070 1ClickOC
MSI GeForce RTX 5070 Inspire 3X vs KFA2 GeForce RTX 5070 Ti HOF
MSI GeForce RTX 5070 Inspire 3X vs MSI GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Vanguard
MSI GeForce RTX 5070 Inspire 3X vs KFA2 GeForce RTX 5070 1ClickOC
